Step 1 · Claim
Was H. G. D. Brown the buyer of Hilliard in the 1856 sale?
Under Investigation· 5 sourcesBT-CLM-00166
Later records connect Hilliard to H. G. D. Brown, but the entered sale record does not name a buyer.
Step 2 · Evidence & Source
Contextualizes · Context Only weight
Hilliard was sold in 1856. The settlement does not name the buyer.
William Q. Taliaferro Estate Final Administrator's Settlement (records the 1856 sale of Hilliard) · FamilySearch (digital images of county court records) · Digital Image
BT-EVD-00138 ← BT-SRC-00118
Researcher interpretation · Amberly R. Carter-Mills
The transaction is documented; the purchaser is not.Partially Supports · Weak weight
A man of about thirty-five is entered in the H. G. D. Brown block of the 1860 slave schedule. Hilliard is recorded elsewhere as born about 1823, which would make him about thirty-seven in June 1860. The schedule records no names, so this line is age-consistent with Hilliard; it does not identify him. What gives it weight is the company it keeps: Hilliard's own later account names H. G. D. Brown as the man who held him. Read against the 1865 Freedmen's Bureau register, which names this person under the same former owner, this line is consistent with the documented household rather than standing alone.
“1 | 35 | M | B”
1860 U.S. Census Slave Schedule — H. G. D. Brown Household, Copiah County, Mississippi · FamilySearch · p. 12 (penned), right column, H. G. D. Brown entry, line 5; digital image 12 of 101 · Digital Image
BT-EVD-00145 ← BT-SRC-00034
Researcher interpretation · Amberly R. Carter-Mills
Age-consistent but unnamed. Cannot identify Hilliard on its own.Partially Supports · Moderate weight
Hilliard is recorded as formerly enslaved by H. G. D. Brown.
Register of Formerly Enslaved People — H. G. D. Brown / Lucky Hit Plantation · FamilySearch / National Archives and Records Administration · pp. 10-11, image 7 of 81 · Digital Image
BT-EVD-00147 ← BT-SRC-00035
Researcher interpretation · Amberly R. Carter-Mills
Later evidence connects Hilliard to Brown, making Brown a plausible buyer in the 1856 transaction. The currently entered sale record does not independently identify the buyer.Contextualizes · Context Only weight
H. G. D. Brown is reported in a derivative transcription of the 1860 Copiah County slave schedules as holding 46 enslaved people. The schedules name no enslaved person; this does not identify Hilliard. Original 1860 slave schedule images must be reviewed for direct source verification.
Copiah County, Mississippi — Largest Slaveholders from 1860 Slave Census Schedules · RootsWeb (website) · Copiah County table · Transcription
BT-EVD-00256 ← BT-SRC-00242
Researcher interpretation · Amberly R. Carter-Mills
Contextual only. A derivative transcription reporting how many people a slaveholder held cannot identify any individual, because the 1860 slave schedules record no names.Contextualizes · Context Only weight
R. H. Taliaferro is reported in the same derivative transcription as holding 44 enslaved people in 1860. Nothing in this transcription establishes that Hilliard was one of those 44 people. Original 1860 slave schedule images must be reviewed for direct source verification.
Copiah County, Mississippi — Largest Slaveholders from 1860 Slave Census Schedules · RootsWeb (website) · Copiah County table · Transcription
BT-EVD-00257 ← BT-SRC-00242
Researcher interpretation · Amberly R. Carter-Mills
Contextual only. A derivative transcription reporting how many people a slaveholder held cannot identify any individual, because the 1860 slave schedules record no names.
Step 3 · Conclusion
No conclusion has been published. This remains an open research question. Does a bill of sale, deed, note, or estate voucher identify the purchaser of Hilliard in 1856?